Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter75

Text File | 1996-07-08 | 49KB | 888 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC
20006.

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is May 31, 1982, and
this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 75.

   Here, in the United States, today is a major holiday, Memorial Day.
For most of us it's a day off from our jobs, a day for picnics or to
visit friends and relatives. The Memorial Day week-end is famous for
traffic jams, highway accidents, and the Indianapolis 500 Auto Race.
And Memorial Day is a seasonal turning point, marking the beginning of
the traditional summer vacation season. Most of us tend to welcome
Memorial Day as the gateway to summer, but Memorial Day also has a
more solemn meaning which we sometimes forget. It's the day we have
set aside to honor the Servicemen who have died fighting for our
country. Memorial Day is a reminder that war has become a stark
reality for America time after time, and each time the cost in human
lives has been tragic.

   As I look ahead to the summer of 1982 now beginning, it's with
mixed feelings. Like most other Americans, I'm looking forward to the
activities that make the summer vacation season a time to enjoy; but
the summer ahead will also be a time of increasing danger for America.

   The timetable for nuclear war which I made public three months ago
in AUDIO LETTER No. 72 is still in effect, my friends. That timetable
calls for NUCLEAR WAR ONE to erupt by mid-September 1982, barely three
months from now. The American Bolsheviks who now control the United
States Pentagon are not slowing down in their war preparations. This
is true in spite of the fact that part of their war plan has been
crippled, as I detailed last month.

   The covert warfare that spawned the so-called Falklands crisis has
all but ruined the Pentagon plans for final victory in the coming war;
but the Bolshevik war-planners here have a suicidal streak in their
thinking, and they are bent on war regardless of the consequences.

   As I say these words, headlines are growing larger and larger about
the Falklands war between Argentina and Britain. Since I spoke to you
last month, heavy losses have been reported on both sides. Argentina
has lost her only cruiser, the General Belgrano, plus several minor
vessels and a number of aircraft. Britain has so far admitted losing
five major ships--two destroyers, two frigates, and a container ship
full of war materiel. These reports reflect the scale of the present
fighting somewhat but they are incomplete and distorted. As in every
war, the truth has become the first casualty.

   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:

Topic #1--THE PENTAGON COUNTDOWN TOWARD NUCLEAR WAR ONE Topic #2--THE
ECONOMIC ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Topic #3--BILLY
GRAHAM VERSUS THE BOLSHEVIK WAR LOBBY.

Topic #1--In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 two months ago I revealed that an
entire new nuclear war strategy against Russia is being developed here
in Washington. It is being worked out by an elite military-planning
group in extreme secrecy under the code name "PROJECT Z." It's a rush
project calling for NUCLEAR WAR ONE itself to begin by September of
this year 1982.

   Last month I reported that PROJECT Z was continuing to move fast at
the secret war-planning room here in downtown Washington. As I stated,
the process of flushing out the basic war plan was already under way.
Now, my friends, the first complete draft of the total PROJECT Z war
plan is ready. The plan is essentially completed with nothing left to
do but make minor refinements here and there. And now the existence of
this major new United States nuclear war plan is creeping into the
news. Just yesterday, May 30, an article about it appeared for the
very first time in the New York Times. The article, by Richard
Halloran, carries the headline, "PENTAGON DRAWS UP FIRST STRATEGY FOR
FIGHTING A LONG NUCLEAR WAR." The article begins, quote:

  "Defense Department policymakers in a new five-year defense plan
have accepted the premise that nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union
could be protracted, and have drawn up their first strategy for
fighting such a war."

The article goes on to mention that the plan is laid out in an
unpublished document of 125 pages. It's been drafted for approval by
Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.

   My friends, I've reported many times now that the United States
Pentagon is controlled by the Bolsheviks who formerly controlled
Russia. I've also identified Weinberger as the highest visible agent
of the Bolsheviks here in the United States Government today.

   The nuclear war plans of the Bolsheviks here are moving fast; but
as I have also reported before, the United States Government today is
a house divided. The Bolsheviks are opposed by their bitter rivals,
the Rockefeller cartel. Their top visible operative in the federal
government today is Secretary of State Alexander Haig. The often
visible feuding between Haig and Weinberger is only a pale shadow of
this deadly power struggle behind the scenes. Unlike the Bolsheviks
here, the Rockefeller faction do not want nuclear war. In a word, they
cannot afford it. They would lose everything, and so the Rockefeller
faction here is working feverishly to head off the Bolshevik nuclear
war plan.

   The new anti-Bolshevik rulers of Russia are also against nuclear
war. The anti-Bolshevik, anti-nuclear-war attitudes of the Rockefeller
cartel and the Kremlin has led to a limited coalition between them in
recent months. The most spectacular result so far from this
Rockefeller-Russian coalition is the Falklands war now raging between
Argentina and Britain. In AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month I reported
what the Falklands war is all about. It is the visible aftermath to
covert warfare which took place during April. The Rockefeller cartel
and the Russians joined forces to destroy certain major military
installations and weapons reserves. These were key ingredients in the
final phase of the PROJECT Z war plan.

   The whole operation began at South Georgia Island on April 3. With
the help of Argentina a joint Rockefeller-Russian commando team was
able to knock out the giant hidden naval base there. The base, built
during the 1960s, was originally controlled through the United States
Government by the Rockefeller cartel, but the Bolsheviks here acquired
control of the bases about three years ago when they seized control of
the American Pentagon.

   Last month I detailed how the attack on the base was carried out.
It was contained within a giant man-made cavern hollowed out inside a
mountain near the water. With the camouflaged ship entrances sealed
up, the base was bombproof; but the joint Rockefeller-Russian commando
team succeeded in attacking the base by drilling a shaft through the
mountain. Then a compact Russian neutron bomb was inserted through the
shaft and detonated inside the cavernous naval base. The process took
several weeks. The Thatcher government, which  like the United States
Pentagon is Bolshevik controlled, dispatched the Royal Navy. First, it
was supposed to dislodge the heavily-armed Rockefeller-Russian
military force before it could destroy the naval base; then it was to
move on to the Falkl ands for the publicly-admitted fighting.

   The Royal Navy arrived several days too late to save the secret
base on South Georgia Island, as I reported last month; but by that
time the panicking Thatcher government had already committed some
two-thirds of the Royal Navy to the South Atlantic. On top of that, at
least one British ship had already been sunk by Russia in connection
with the secret South Georgia operation. That left the Thatcher
government with no choice but to engage Argentina in battle, otherwise
it would have been impossible to explain away Britain's huge
deployment to the South Atlantic, much less the heavy losses which had
been sustained.

   When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month on April 30 the
British blockade of the Falklands was just beginning. Later that day
the entity President Reagan announced that the United States was
actively siding with Britain. The announcement was a victory for the
Pentagon war faction. Right away warfare around the Falklands started
heating up fast. On May 1 the British launched bombing raids against
the airport at Port Stanley, and on May 2 a British submarine
torpedoed Argentina's second largest ship, the cruiser General
Belgrano. It sank within 24 hours, leaving a death toll of more than
300 Argentine sailors. The sinking of the Belgrano was expected to
demoralize the Argentines, but instead it enraged them. The Belgrano
had been sunk at a time when it was not threatening the British
forces. The Argentines decided it was time to start playing their ace
in the hole against Britain.

   Last month I reported that Argentina had been given certain
promises in return for making the secret South Georgia operation
possible. One of these was the promise of covert military assistance
by Russia against Britain. Specifically, it was pledged that the
Russians would intervene in parallel with Argentine air and naval
operations in ways designed to even the odds. In this way Argentina's
military leaders can take full credit for both their own and covert
Russian attacks on the British. At the same time, this procedure is
designed to keep Russia's role in the fighting obscure.

   On May 4 the Argentine Air Force decided to put Russia's promises
to the test. A pair of Fighter bombers headed out over the Atlantic to
attack the Royal Navy. Acting on reconnaissance data provided by
Russian Spy Satellites, they headed straight for the fleet. As the two
low-flying Argentine jets appeared on the horizon, they were picked up
by British fleet radar. At the same time, a Russian Cosmosphere
hovering many miles above the fleet took final aim at one of the
ships. The ship was one of Britain's newest, most modern, most
sophisticated ships, designed specifically to shield the fleet against
air attack. The ship was a Type-42 guided missile destroyer, H.M.S.
Sheffield. Long before the two Argentine jets were close enough to
attack, the Cosmosphere fired its charged particle beam-weapon
downward at the ship. The white-hot beam of subatomic particles
blasted through the aluminum superstructure just behind the bridge
near the top of the ship. In a split second the beam seared through
layers of metal downward into the bowels of the ship. The aluminum of
the ship itself was instantly ablaze. The Argentine Fighter pilots
witnessed the spectacular explosion and intense white flames from
nearly 20 miles away. They promptly turned back toward home, having
expended no missiles. Bewildered survivors from the Sheffield later
said there had been no warning before the blast.

   Argentina's leaders are being coached by Rockefeller cartel
operatives in what to say publicly about war developments. They claim
that a French-made missile called the Exocet had been used to sink the
Sheffield; but to those who know the characteristics of the Exocet
missile, the Sheffield disaster remained a mystery.

   The Exocet, my friends, is a type of missile known as a
sea-skimmer. It's designed to skim along just above the water,
striking a ship almost at the water line. File films of the Exocet
which have been shown on TV clearly show this behavior. But the
Sheffield was blasted close to the very top of the superstructure; in
fact, that is said to be the reason for the relatively low casualty
toll in the destruction of H.M.S. Sheffield. Had the same blast been
aimed low close to the waterline, the ship probably would have heeled
over and sunk fast. Had that happened, very few of the crew would have
escaped.

   On the evening of May 4, Admiral Martin Wemyss, former director of
the British naval warfare, was interviewed about the Sheffield
disaster on ABC Nightline. Ted Koppel began with the words:

  "Admiral Wemyss, how is it that such a modern ship would not have
been able to first of all detect and then destroy that Argentine
aircraft?"

Admiral Wemyss answered, quote:

  "I think that's an extremely good question, and I cannot give you a
straight answer. In my book, this should not have happened."

   For the next two weeks talks between Argentina and Britain
continued with United Nations Secretary General Perez de Cuellar
attempting to mediate.

   Meanwhile, the Thatcher government continued to add to the British
armada in the South Atlantic. Even the luxury liner Queen Elizabeth II
was commandeered and turned into a troop ship. It sailed with some
3200 troops aboard on May 12.

   The strategy of the Bolshevik-dominated Thatcher government is very
simple, my friends. They know very well they are sending the Royal
Navy into a trap, but they believe that by multiplying naval strength
in the South Atlantic virtually beyond reason, they will win. They are
making the British commitment so huge compared to that of Argentina
that a total Argentine rout of the British would look unreasonable. It
would enable the question of covert Russian aid to Argentina to be
raised openly and credibly, and that could help set off the very
nuclear war which they know Russia is trying to avoid.

   Following this brute-force strategy, the Thatcher government has
continued to pour every available ship into the South Atlantic fray.
As of now, over 100 British ships are either in the war zone or
heading toward it. That's almost the entire Royal Navy! The attitude
is: for every ship the Russians and Argentineans sink, the Thatcher
government will just send two more--anything to make sure Britain
retakes the Falklands because if that is not accomplished, the
Thatcher government will fall and that will be a setback to Bolshevik
power in Britain.

   On May 19 the last ditch talks at the United Nations finally
collapsed. Britain was ready at last to invade. After talks ended that
evening, it was announced that the British War Cabinet would meet the
following morning. Supposedly the meeting would decide whether to give
the go-ahead for invasion--but it was all a ruse to help create an
element of surprise against Argentina and against Russia.

   The first stage of an elaborate invasion strategy was already going
into action. On the evening of May 19 the British invasion fleet was
divided up into two groups--one group was 150 miles due east of Port
Stanley; the other, 100 miles to the northeast. Shortly before
midnight Washington time, both invasion forces started heading toward
shore. Russian Cosmospheres and submarines went into action working
together. Both British assault groups came under fire. At least two
ships critical to the assault were hit and heavily damaged. By 2:00
A.M. Washington time both assault forces aborted their moves toward
the Port Stanley area. In response, Russian forces disengaged. The
Russians believed they had thwarted the British invasion; but, my
friends, they were wrong.

   The two large invasion groups threatening Port Stanley the night of
May 19 were actually carrying out a diversionary action. British
strategists knew that the Russians had the muscle available to stop
any invasion. The only chance of success lay in convincing the
Russians that they had stopped the invasion, and then somehow sneaking
troops ashore. So the two large invasion forces of May 19 actually
were st aging a decoy action! Most of the British invasion troops were
no longer aboard the troop carrier Canberra or the assault ships.
Instead, they had been transferred to other ships which normally are
not used for amphibious purposes.

   On the morning of May 20 the elaborate British deception continued.
Up until the previous day, British statements had been referring to an
imminent all-out invasion, but on the morning of May 20 the statements
changed abruptly. British Defense Ministry spokesmen suddenly started
saying that the British would confine themselves to small hit-and-run
raids for a while. The Bolshevik military planners in London wanted to
further convince Russia that the invasion had been stopped the
previous night. It worked.

   Small groups of British ships began moving around the Falklands as
if to plant small raiding parties here and there. In the early morning
darkness of May 21 one of these small groups of ships moved into the
north end of Falkland Sound between the Islands. Contrary to press
reports, the troop ship Canberra was not among them, nor was an
assault ship. Those ships would have tipped off the Russians
monitoring everything from Cosmospheres far above that a major landing
was afoot. Instead, the key ship that moved into San Carlos Bay was
the hospital ship Uganda. Under cover of darkness the Uganda moved
close to shore. British assault troops, crammed like sardines into the
Uganda, clambered down the sides of the ship on rope ladders into
motor launches. The launches ferried the troops a short distance
ashore, one group after another. As soon as they were ashore, the
troops had orders to spread out fast. In that way they rendered
themselves unsuitable targets for any attack by the Russian
Cosmospheres patrolling miles above. Particle beam-weapons are
devastating against concentrated targets but very inefficient against
personnel scattered over a wide area. By dawn other ships had also
disembarked troops in the same manner. By the time daylight revealed
what was really going on, it was too late. The British invasion of the
Falklands was underway. Once the British got ashore with a sizeable
number of troops, Britain's chances of regaining control of the
Islands started increasing fast. Covert Russian help for the
Argentines is much more feasible at sea and in the air than on land.

   In the past 10 days we've heard about a number of devastating air
attacks by the Argentines. Up to now the British have admitted losing
at least five ships plus several helicopters and Harrier Jump-jets,
but slowly the British ground forces have been reinforced and started
advancing across East Falkland Island towards Port Stanley. As of
today, May 31, British ground forces are said to be closing in on the
main Argentine garrison at Port Stanley. The operation is being
portrayed in the news here as a relatively easy task, but that is far
from true.

   British casualties in land battle have been far greater than
admitted, and at sea the Royal Navy has taken very heavy losses that
are not even hinted at so far in the news. Many ships have been badly
damaged; and all--I repeat, ALL--of the original contingent of the Sea
Harrier Jump-jets have been put out of action. Both British aircraft
carriers, the Hermes and the Invincible, have been rendered incapable
of launching jets. The Harriers now operating around the Falklands are
a different type from the sharp-nosed, blue-painted Sea Harriers. They
are painted in green and brown camouflage. My friends, they are United
States Marine Corps Harriers, and they are operating from an American
ship!

   The things I am revealing here, my friends, are at variance with
official stories, but this is the war you never see. Photos of British
amphibious exercises taken at Ascension Island were passed off as
pictures of the Falklands invasion. British Broadcasting Corporation
broadcasting facilities on Ascension Island were taken over weeks ago
by British military. Now we hear daily reports from Ascension Island
that are claimed to be originating with the task force. Even more than
usual, the truth has been the first casualty in the Falklands war.

   The Bolshevik military planners here and in the Thatcher government
in Britain are trying to find some way to use the Falklands war for
their own purposes. Up to now they still are not slowing down in their
fast timetable for NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

   Within a few short weeks there will be a highly visible clue to the
status of the Bolshevik nuclear war schedule. I am referring, my
friends, to the upcoming fourth space shuttle flight. All the space
shuttle flights up to now have been military in nature, as I have
detailed in the past. The space shuttle is the Pentagon's only hope to
regain a military toe hold in space for the coming war. Now for the
first time it is even being admitted that the next shuttle flight will
be military.

   Shuttle flight #4 is presently scheduled for June 27, less than a
month from now. If some excuse is found to delay the flight, it will
reflect a slowdown in the nuclear war plans of the Pentagon; but if
Shuttle #4 takes off on schedule, it will indicate that the Bolsheviks
here are still sticking to their September war-deadline.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 I reported that for the first time the
shuttle had been successful in its prime military mission. A hardened
laser-armed Super-Spy Satellite was orbited in March to obtain fresh
reconnaissance data on Russia. It's the first updating of Russian
target data since Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites some four
years ago. Target data from the new satellite has now been integrated
into the PROJECT Z nuclear war plan which I made public in AUDIO
LETTER No. 73.

   Now, Space Shuttle #4 is being prepared for a different mission.
Under the PROJECT Z war plan, the coming nuclear war will begin with a
surprise nuclear attack by American Stealth planes into Russia. They
will attempt to knock out all of Russia's space bases--four
Cosmodromes for rockets plus Cosmosphere installations in Siberia. If
all goes as planned, all of these installations will be blown up with
H-bombs simultaneously. As soon as that happens, the rest of America's
nuclear arsenal is to be launched at Russia, as I have described
before.

   But there remains one weak point in the Bolshevik first-strike plan
against Russia. As it stands now, the Bolsheviks here will have to
assume that the first phase of the attack plan has succeeded as of a
given time. The reason is that the United States currently has no
means of verifying if the initial Stealth attack has succeeded. When
Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites four years ago she also
destroyed our high-flying Early Warning Satellites. That leaves the
Bolshevik war planners hare without any way to tell if their bombs
have exploded in Russia. Space Shuttle #4 is intended to solve that
problem within weeks from now!

   The supersecret Department of Defense pay load is a cryogenic
infrared Sensor System. It's designed to look down at Russia from
geostationary orbit. It will detect the explosions of American H-bombs
in Russia when it happens. The moment that it flashes a signal
confirming the explosions to the Pentagon, the rest of the American
nuclear first-strike against Russia will be set in motion.

   In order to do its job, the Air Force infrared Sensor has to be
placed in geostationary orbit. That orbit is over 22,000 miles high
over the equator. The shuttle itself cannot go that high; it can only
go to low Earth orbit, perhaps 150 miles up. To take the Air Force
Sensor System the rest of the way, it has to be mounted on a rocket.
The shuttle will carry the whole assembly--Sensor System, rocket, and
all--into low Earth orbit. From there the rocket will take the Sensor
System out to the desired location far above the equator.

   My friends, as of now the countdown toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE is still
being continued by the Bolshevik war planners in the Pentagon. The
Falklands crisis began as an effort to prevent or delay nuclear war,
but it may instead end up helping to set off that very war! If so,
America's fourth  space shuttle flight could turn out to be America's
final manned mission into space.

   The Air Force sensor to verify success of America's coming initial
attack on Russia will eventually be destroyed by Russian space
weapons. Before that can happen, the Bolshevik planners in the
Pentagon will try to set off NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

Topic #2--For two months now the Falklands crisis has dominated the
news. Likewise, the growing threat of nuclear war and mounting
anti-nuclear sentiment have been making headlines; but for millions of
Americans, a different crisis seems far more important. It is a
long-term crisis which has been with us for many years now. This
mounting crisis, my friends, is that of the crumbling United States
economy and the United States dollar.

   Just this month, May 1982, there has been all sorts of bad news on
the economic front. On May 7 the Government announced that
unemployment, as officially calculated, had reached 9.4 per cent, the
highest level since the Great Depression. And just five days later
there was another shock--Braniff Airlines abruptly terminated
operations and filed for bankruptcy. It was the first time ever that a
United States trunk airline had failed. Braniff, like more and more
other businesses, was brought down by a mountain of debt. With
interest rates remaining sky high in the midst of a deep recession,
more and more companies simply cannot survive. Production cutbacks,
layoffs, and bankruptcies are continuing to spread, and more and more
people are losing their jobs. This recession is especially cruel
because it is an inflationary recession.

   We're now living in the STAGFLATION era which I warned about in my
book THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR nearly ten years ago. The
deliberate plans which were set in motion long ago to destroy the
United States dollar are now far advanced.

   Since 1970 the combined effects of inflation and taxes have cut the
purchasing power of the dollar by 55 per cent. A family of four living
on $10,000 in 1970 would need well over $23,000 in 1982 just to stay
even, and this historically unprecedented collapse of the dollar is
continuing even as people are thrown out of work.

   For months now the battle over the federal budget has been dragging
on, day in, day out. We're told constantly that the budget is the key
to bringing down the incredible interest rates that are killing the
economy, and yet somehow it seems that no one can agree about what the
budget should be. One budget proposal after another has come up for
consideration only to be voted down. First, there was the Reagan
Administration budget which went nowhere. Then all kinds of
alternative budgets started being proposed. There have been Republican
budgets, Democrat budgets, Conservative budgets, Liberal budgets,
compromise budgets; and every single budget proposed so far has been
voted down. There is more and more talk that the federal budget
process has gone sour, that there is something fundamentally wrong. On
May 28 the entity President Reagan denounced the budget process while
he was in Santa Barbara, California, to make a speech. He said, quote:

  "The United States Government's program for presenting a budget, or
arriving at a budget, is about the most irresponsible, Mickey-Mouse
arrangement that any governmental body has ever practiced. It's called
the 'President's Budget' and yet there is nothing binding about it. It
is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to consider it."

   My friends, please note carefully how this criticism by the
President was phrased. I suggest you stop your recorder and play it
back again because the entity Reagan was not just delivering a
standard political tongue-lashing at his political opponents. He was
condemning the process itself, and he added, quote:

  "I think that some real solid thinking should be given now to a
budgeting process that befits the great government of a great nation."

   My friends, Reagan's choice of Santa Barbara, California, for this
statement was symbolic. It so happens that the so-called "solid
thinking" he recommended for a new budgeting process has already been
done; and as the President knows very well, that thinking was done in
Santa Barbara at a tax-exempt foundation called the "Center for Study
of Democratic Institutions." That is where the secret new Constitution
for America was written, including detailed new provisions for the
budgeting process!

   Seven years ago in 1975 I published a pamphlet in which I reviewed
the secret new Constitution from a legal perspective. The entire text
of the new Constitution is contained in the pamphlet. If you have a
copy, you can read about the proposed new budget process for yourself.
It's all there in black and white. Important passages to look at
include:

   ARTICLE IV--THE PLANNING BRANCH, Sections 2, 4, and 7;
   ARTICLE V--THE PRESIDENCY, Section 1, and
   ARTICLE VI-(b)--THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Section 8.

   What you will discover if you trace through the budget process
described in the new Constitution is very significant. When all the
legal-sounding mumbo jumbo is stripped away, the whole budget process
turns out to be firmly under the thumb of the President.

   For example, Reagan complained in Santa Barbara that the
"President's Budget", quote:

  "...is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to
consider it."

   My friends, the secret new Constitution would fix that. ARTICLE
VI-(b), Section 8 begins, quote:

  "The House shall consider promptly the annual budget."

What's more, the House is given no role in formulating the Budget. If
they dare to object to anything, the Budget goes back to the Planning
Board, so called, controlled by, you guessed it, the President.

   The Reagan blast about the budget process is just the latest of an
on-going series of covert moves to pave the way for the new
Constitution. What makes this one more significant is that it is tied
in with powerful economic forces which are intended to speed up the
process.

   Through months of contrived haggling, the "kept" Congress has been
sensitizing Americans to the budget problem and they have been doing
it at a time when uncertainty over the Budget is being blamed for
worsening economic woes!

   Now along comes the President saying that the solution is to change
the whole process.

   The growing Budget crisis is also tied in with another major change
which the entity President Reagan has been publicly advocating. That
change, my friends, is the proposed "Balanced Budget Amendment" to our
present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

   There is a drive underway right now to call a Constitutional
Convention in order to introduce a balanced budget amendment. Already
most of the required number of states have ratified the call for such
a convention! At the moment, if just three (3) more states ratify it,
a Constitutional Convention will be legally required to be called. The
excuse for calling a Constitutional Convention would be to introduce
the Balanced Budget Amendment. The problem is that once a convention
is called, there's no way to keep it from turning into a runaway
convention, re-writing the entire CONSTITUTION! In fact, that's
exactly how our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION was created. The
original idea was to simply amend the "Articles of Confederation"; but
once the Convention was through, a totally new constitution emerged.

   Those who are behind the drive for a new Constitutional Convention
now want the same thing to happen again; and if it does, they have
their model for a carefully manicured  DICTATORSHIP Constitution ready
to go!

   In the past there have been several other drives like the present
one to call a Constitutional Convention. Each has been built around
some pet idea of one kind or another, but each time the drive has
fizzled out. Enough people have recognized the danger of a runaway
Constitutional Convention to prevent its happening. This time, though,
the danger is much greater than ever before because this time the
excuse for the proposed convention is tied directly to people's
pocketbook s.

   We're being told by various financial spokesmen on television that
high interest rates are responsible for our economic woes, which is a
half truth. We are also told that government deficits are responsible
for keeping those disastrous interest rates high. Then we are treated
to the spectacle of a government seemingly unable to decide on a
budget. And, finally, whenever a budget is passed, it will contain the
biggest deficits in history--well over one hundred billion dollars.

   Against that background, the promise of relief by way of the
Balanced Budget Amendment may prove too tempting to resist. If so, the
drive to call a Constitutional Convention will succeed, and in the
process we Americans will have sold our birthright for a mess of
pottage!

   My friends, all of this may sound almost irrelevant right now in
view of the specter of possible nuclear war by the end of summer, but
never forget that the plans for war are the plans of men, nothing
more. Those plans have a way of going awry in many cases; and in the
case of those nuclear war plans, feverish attempts are underway to
make them go awry.

   The Bolshevik war planners who control the Pentagon want nuclear
war; but their anti-Bolshevik enemies who now rule Russia don't want
war and are trying to prevent it. Likewise, the Rockefeller cartel
here in America is in a power struggle against the Bolsheviks in an
attempt to stop the war plan.

   If the Rockefeller interests do succeed in regaining control of the
United States Government, they plan to stop the Bolshevik war
countdown. But the Rockefeller group are fighting this battle only for
themselves, my friends, not for you or me! It is they who are behind
the secret new Constitution and the drive for a Constitutional
Convention. If they succeed in beating the Bolsheviks here, they
intend to capitalize. With their secret new Constitution they plan to
bring us under their domination more completely than ever before.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 72 three months ago I reported that a military
coup d'etat was in gestation here in Washington. This is to be a coup
by the Rockefeller cartel operatives within the Government against
Bolshevik operatives. The man in charge is a four-star
General--Alexander Haig.

   Up to now the anti-Bolshevik coup has not been accomplished, but it
is gaining ground. One major gain for the Rockefeller faction occurred
last month while all eyes were on the Falklands crisis. On April 21 it
was announced that Admiral Bobby Inman, Deputy Director of the CIA,
had "resigned" (quote) effective immediately. Inman was forced out by
the Rockefeller faction. He was replaced with lightning speed by John
McMann, a career professional with the CIA!

   It was the Rockefellers who created the CIA long ago as their own
private detective agency, and now they are working fast to
re-establish the control which they lost over the CIA three years ago.

   The infighting between the Rockefeller and Bolshevik factions
within the Government is growing more intense as the war fuse burns
shorter and shorter. President Reagan and Secretary Haig are both
under tight security. This summer of 1982 will be dangerous for them
and for America.

Topic #3--On the evening of May 16 millions of Americans tuned their
television sets to NBC to watch the first installment of a special
mini-series. It was a lavish portrayal of the travels and adventures
of Marco Polo. For the next four nights viewers were treated to a
spectacular re-enactment of Marco Polo's experiences as he traveled to
China. Interspersed with those scenes of adventure and splendor were
brief scenes depicting what happened to Marco Polo after he returned
home to Venice. He dared to speak of places he had been and things he
had seen that conflicted with the dogma of the day, and so he was
tried for heresy.

   Today in 1982 we like to think of ourselves as too enlightened to
close our minds like the inquisitors of Marco Polo, but the fact is
that even today those who challenge preconceived notions are quickly
branded as heretics and the like. There was a perfect example of this
on Sunday morning May 16. Ironically it was the same day as the
beginning of the Marco Polo series. My friends, I'm referring to the
interview of evangelist Dr. Billy Graham on the ABC news program "This
Week with David Brinkley."

   Dr. Graham had just returned to England from participating in a
five-day religious conference in Moscow, Russia, of all places. He was
one of more than 400 religious leaders from 80 nations who attended
the conference. They were there at the invitation of the Russian
Orthodox Church which sponsored the Conference. A large fraction of
those who attended were Christian leaders such as Dr. Graham, but
there were also many representatives of the world's other great
religions. They were not there to convert, to compete, or to condemn
one another. Instead it was a rare opportunity for these leaders to
form bridges of mutual understanding, something which is all too often
neglected in our world.

   It was a religious conference the likes of which the world has not
seen for more than 80 years. The last time anything like this took
place was before 1900. It was held here in America, in Chicago, and it
was called "The Parliament of Religions." There were some who feared
that historic meeting of the minds and have condemned it ever since.
As a result, it has never been repeated here in America; but I submit,
my friends, that those fears were groundless. The Parliament of
Religions did not destroy Christianity or turn Americans overnight
into Buddhists, Moslems, or Hindus. What it did do was to establish
bonds of understanding and respect for a while where they had been
lacking before. My friends, it is a psychological fact that it is
usually hard to hate another person if you get to know him. That is
why any government bent on war tries to dehumanize and depersonalize
the enemy.

   From the turn of the century onward, the United States Government
has been controlled by elements who cherish war as an instrument of
policy, so we see no more Parliaments of Religion here in America.

   By contrast, the government of Russia has undergone a drastic
transformation in recent years. Russia's new rulers are Christians, as
I have been reporting for nearly five years. After an agonizing
struggle of six decades, these tough native Russians have finally
gained the upper hand over the Satanic Bolsheviks there. Over three
years ago the growing power of the Kremlin Christians started
producing startling changes in public. For example, for Easter 1979
Handel's "Messiah" was performed in Russia for the very first time
since the Bolshevik Revolution! And several months before that, in
January 1979, the first legal shipment of Bibles into Russia since
1917 had taken place. The American Bible Society had asked the Russian
government for permission, and it had been granted.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 over three years ago I issued an appeal to
America's Christian leaders to take a stand for peace before it was
too late. What I suggested was a "Pilgrimage for Peace" to Moscow.
It's purpose would have been to begin new ties of trust and
understanding with the new Christian rulership of Russia. In that way
America's churchmen had the opportunity to take the initiative in a
concrete way to help head off nuclear catastrophe. The response, as I
reported later, was pathetic. To the everlasting shame of America's
Christian community, only a tiny handful of Christian leaders
expressed any interest at all! The Christian leaders of America by and
large refused to hold out the hand of Christian fellowship to their
brothers in Russia.

   But now, a pilgrimage for peace has been made to Moscow after all.
Since America's Christian leaders would not bother to take the
initiative, those of Russia did so instead! They invited religious
leaders the world over to make a pilgrimage for peace to Moscow, and
they called their five-day assembly the, quote:

  "Conference of Religious Workers for Saving the Sacred Gift of Life
from Nuclear Catastrophe."

   When Billy Gra ham and some other Western Christian leaders arrived
in Moscow, they soon discovered that it was not as they had beenled
to expect. Dr. Graham discovered that there was no attempt to restrict
him in his religious messages. He was also allowed more freedom of
movement than he had expected. On the Saturday evening before the
Conference began, Dr. Graham decided to pay unannounced visits to
several Moscow churches. He went to three different Russian Orthodox
Churches and was shocked to find that they were filled to capacity
with worshippers. As he said later in a news conference, quote:

  "You would never get that in Charlotte, North Carolina."

Dr. Graham made a number of statements about his experiences in Moscow
which all seem to add up to one thing: there is a lot more Christian
worship going on in Russia than he apparently expected and with
greater freedom.

   When Billy Graham returned to the West he must have felt a little
like a religious Marco Polo. He had journeyed to the forbidden East
and discovered that it is not populated by gremlins and horrible
beasts. Instead he had come away with his heart strangely "warmed"
(quote). Perhaps he expected that the folks back home would welcome
his unexpected good news. After all, our whole Christian faith is
built on Good News--the Gospel of our LORD Jesus Christ. But if that
is what Billy Graham expected, he was sadly mistaken.

   When he returned to the West, he came back not to people eager to
hear more of his good news, but to hostility and condemnation! We're
always told that Russia is an atheistic country and beyond redemption,
and so by definition Billy Graham's words about even limited religious
freedom in Russia constituted heresy. He ran into a buzz saw of
critics determined to cut him down for saying a good word about
Russia!

   It began right away with slanted reports about his statements in
the major media. At one point Dr. Graham mentioned that in Russia his
comments had been reported accurately in the press. By contrast,
reports here in the United States were distorted, and quoted him out
of context.

   A perfect example of the treatment now being given Dr. Graham was
his May 16 interview on ABC's "This Week with David Brinkley." It was
called an interview, but inquisition would be a better description.
Every suggestion that Christians may be better off in Russia today
than in the past was met with hostility. Time after time after time
Dr. Graham was interrupted and attacked before he could even finish
making his point, and many of the questions in the best tradition of
heresy trials were designed to declare Graham guilty before he could
even answer!

   To take just one example: at one point the ideological writer
George F. Will mentioned an incident in which a peace protestor was
subdued by Russian police. Then he asked--and this is an exact quote:

  "Given that evidence that there is no, and is not about to be, any
peace movement in the Soviet Union, wasn't it clear to you from the
start that this propaganda festival to which you were going was used
simply to encourage a unilateral peace pressure and disarmament
pressure in the West?"

My friends, a so-called question like that is the tool of a
prosecutor, not an objective reporter. In one breath he claimed that
there is no peace movement in Russia as if it were a fact, accused Dr.
Graham of knowingly cooperating in Soviet propaganda, implied that all
the world religious leaders who attended were stooges, and ignored the
world-wide representation at the Conference saying it was all aimed at
the West. Accusing questions like that were fired at Dr. Graham
throughout the program. The only break in this inquisition came when
Dr. Graham was removed from the discussion for a while--then everyone
else sat around and ripped him up one side and down the other in his
absence, for his 'heresies.'

   In spite of the grossly unfair treatment, Rev. Graham made some
very telling points. He mentioned that many other American Christian
leaders were also at the Moscow Conference and that still others have
gone there separately, and he said there are many, quote:

  "...that would hold different viewpoints than what is being
expressed here today. I'm a little surprised that we don't have some
of those people."

Perhaps Dr. Graham's most telling comment came fairly early in the
program; perhaps it was partly responsible for the frenzied bitterness
of some of the attacks on him later in the program. Rev. Graham said,
and I quote:

  "Now when people go to China today, for example, they are applauded
for going to China. It's wonderful to go to China, but there is not as
much religious freedom in China as there is in the Soviet Union."

   My friends, Billy Graham was exactly right in that statement. I
have reported the same thing in my AUDIO LETTER reports. The favorable
image now being given to Red China is purely political and military in
its origins. Unfortunately some church-related groups are being used
for these political purposes!

   What Dr. Graham may not know is the reason for the violent attacks
he has endured lately. My friends, he has run afoul of the American
Bolshevik nuclear-war lobby here. They want to use you and me to do
their dirty work for them against Russia. That is what their
nuclear-war plans are all about, and so at all costs they must not let
us know that Christianity is reviving today in Russia. Even more, they
dare not let the American people know that the true leadership of
Russia today is Christian because if we all knew that, my friends, we
would never agree to their plans to destroy Christian Russia in a
thermonuclear war.

                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY

   Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO LETTER I've
tried to bring you up to date on the progress of plans to throw
America into nuclear war against Russia. The countdown by the
Bolshevik war planners who now control the Pentagon is still
continuing. Their war plans have been damaged by the Falklands war,
but they are trying to turn that conflict to their own ends.

   Meanwhile, the countdown for Space Shuttle Flight #4 with its
secret military pay load is still on schedule. If the mission
succeeds, the danger of nuclear war will increase dramatically.

   The summer of 1982, my friends, promises to be a dangerous time for
America. As of now, NUCLEAR WAR ONE could be as little as three months
away, but the Bolsheviks here have enemies who are trying to stop the
war-countdown.

   Here in the United States the Rockefeller cartel is continuing its
power struggle to take back control of the Government from the
Bolsheviks. As part of that struggle, the preparations for a military
coup d'etat led by General Alexander Haig are making progress.
Likewise, the Russians are continuing to try in their own ways to
prevent the war. Unlike the Rockefeller cartel, the Russians are doing
this for moral reasons.

   This month, May 1982, religious leaders from around the world
gathered in a religious conference to take a stand for peace. If the
conference had been held, say in Washington, D.C., we would be hearing
nothing but praise about it; but it was held instead in Moscow,
Russia, and for that reason alone it has been condemned here in the
United States. Those who dare to honestly report the favorable
surprises they encountered there are being castigated as heretics. The
most visible of these is Rev. Billy Graham. For describing what he
actually saw and experienced, honestly and without prejudice, he is
being crucified on all sides.

   My friends, the same thing will happen to you if you dare to speak
up about the things you know; but if you do not speak up to your
friends, to your neighbors, to your relatives, they may never know why
we are heading toward nuclear catastrophe. So I urge you to speak now,
and remember the promise of our LORD Jesus Christ. He said:

  "Blessed are they who are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for
theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])